Section 21 due October 24
1. Not too confusing. One question: so the special symbols for the equivalence relations. Are those all assigned? But they're not necessarily standardized? Is that what it means when it says always look for them to be defined in the paper? Anyway, that's my only question.
2. It's interesting to reach the point where there is some inconsistency in notation. It's just not something that I've ever considered that in upper level math writing, a lot of it will be defined within the context. It's comforting to know that even mathematicians may not be familiar with all types of notation. They just have the tools to figure it out.
2. It's interesting to reach the point where there is some inconsistency in notation. It's just not something that I've ever considered that in upper level math writing, a lot of it will be defined within the context. It's comforting to know that even mathematicians may not be familiar with all types of notation. They just have the tools to figure it out.
Comments
Post a Comment